Georgia’s highest court rejected an appeal from the Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in her efforts to return to her scattered election interference against Donald Trump after she was disqualified by Blockbuster -criminal investigation last year.
Tuesday’s divided decision by Georgia Supreme Court is a significant victory for Trump and his allies accused of led a “criminal company” to overthrow the state’s election results by 2020.
The fate of the last-remaining criminal investigation against the president now remains unclear after sitting in hibernation for months.
Trump avoided a prison sentence after a jury in New York found him guilty of 34 censuses of fraud last year, and now-Order-Special Advisor Jack Smith fell two federal charges against Trump for his attempt to overthrow election results and withhold classified documents.
After celebrating the decision on truth social, Trump called prosecutors who investigated his attempts to have the election results of the election results “criminals”, which “will hopefully pay seriously for their illegal acts.”
These cases against him “should now be dead for good,” he said.
“They went after their political opponent on levels that were never seen before and lost,” he wrote. “They are now criminals who will hopefully pay seriously for their illegal acts. Our country had died a year ago, largely because the illegal weapon of the US legal system of the Radical Left Democrats. As we end illegal legislation, the United States is back. Better than ever before.”
In a speech outside the White House, Trump told journalists that he thinks Willis “should be in prison.”
Last year, after several days of hearings about Trump’s Altegations, which Willi’s financially enjoyed the case by hiring outside prosecutor Nathan Wade with whom she was once romantically involved, the judge decided that the case decided that one of them aside.
Wade then submitted his resignation.
Trump and his co -defendants appeal and argue that “nothing in the law of a place is that the remedy of an appearance of inappropriate is the disqualification of a seemingly conflict attorney but not another.”
Lawyers for Willi claimed that the accusations against her were dependent on Salacious rumors, gossip and induendo designed to “PEPARRAS and harass her,” all with indefinite delay of the criminal case against Trump and his allies.
In December, a panel of Republican-Appoited Judges for State Appeals Court Willi’s hiring of WADE love for a “Navericant” conflict of conflict that was in Warranéd’s dismissal from the prosecution team.
However, the Court did not agree with the “extreme” argument of the educational president to reject the case Alterner – potentially leaves the case up to another prosecutor of taking one.
“No Georgia Court has been disqualified a district attorney for simply performance of inappropriate without the existence of an actual conflict of interest,” Willis’ legal team told the State Supreme Court. “And no Georgia court has been reversed a trial’s decision to disqualify a prosecutor based solely on an appearance of inappropriate.
The Prosecutor’s Office Council for Georgia, a state entity with a Republican director, will now decide whether the case should be awarded the case and to whom.
If the case remains with a new prosecutor, Trump is not expected to meet a trial before ending in 2029.
However, his 14 co -defendants could be tried before.
The case brought by the District Attorney in 2023, accuses the President of the Education and his co -defendant of relying on a so -called “false choice” scheme to mistakenly unseen his victory, seize voting machines, scary the electoral world and push the state’s top election official to “find” need to win.
Trump and more than a dozen-accused-inclusive allied Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani, Jeffrey Clark and John Eastman-Var charges under the state’s version of the Rico Act typically used to break organized crime rings.
They also faced a long list of other tax linked to an alleged scheme to undermine the state’s election results.
Four of Trump’s original co-accused-inclusive lawyers Kenneth Chesebro, Jenna Ellis and Sidney Powell-Haven already pleaded guilty to some prosecutor after reaching agreements with prosecutors.
“While I disagree with the decision of the Georgia Court of Appeals and Georgia Supreme Court’s split decision not to review it, I respect the legal process and the courts,” Willis said in a statement on Tuesday.
“Consequently, my office will make the case file and evidence available to the prosecution of the prosecution for use in nails,” she added. “I hope Whover is assigned to deal with the case will have the courage to do what the evidence and law demand.”
While Trump is raging against what he considers “illegal political statutory” from his opponents, the president and his administration have launched a dance of investigation, litigation, mass friezes and threats of prosecution against democratic lawmakers, news sites and federal officials, including the lawyers representing them.
And without the last week, after killing right -wing activist Charlie Kirk, the president has proposed the case of prosecuting leftist groups adapted to democratic figures includes a campaign broken down on protected speech.